BI 172 David Glanzman: Memory All The Way Down

BI 172 David Glanzman: Memory All The Way Down

Brain Inspired
Brain Inspired
BI 172 David Glanzman: Memory All The Way Down
Loading
/

David runs his lab at UCLA where he’s also a distinguished professor.  David used to believe what is currently the mainstream view, that our memories are stored in our synapses, those connections between our neurons.  So as we learn, the synaptic connections strengthen and weaken until their just right, and that serves to preserve the memory. That’s been the dominant view in neuroscience for decades, and is the fundamental principle that underlies basically all of deep learning in AI. But because of his own and others experiments, which he describes in this episode, David has come to the conclusion that memory must be stored not at the synapse, but in the nucleus of neurons, likely by some epigenetic mechanism mediated by RNA molecules. If this sounds familiar, I had Randy Gallistel on the the podcast on episode 126 to discuss similar ideas, and David discusses where he and Randy differ in their thoughts. This episode starts out pretty technical as David describes the series of experiments that changed his mind, but after that we broaden our discussion to a lot of the surrounding issues regarding whether and if his story about memory is true. And we discuss meta-issues like how old discarded ideas in science often find their way back, what it’s like studying non-mainstream topic, including challenges trying to get funded for it, and so on.

BI 171 Mike Frank: Early Language and Cognition

BI 171 Mike Frank: Early Language and Cognition

Brain Inspired
Brain Inspired
BI 171 Mike Frank: Early Language and Cognition
Loading
/

My guest is Michael C. Frank, better known as Mike Frank, who runs the Language and Cognition lab at Stanford. Mike’s main interests center on how children learn language – in particular he focuses a lot on early word learning, and what that tells us about our other cognitive functions, like concept formation and social cognition.
We discuss that, his love for developing open data sets that anyone can use,
The dance he dances between bottom-up data-driven approaches in this big data era, traditional experimental approaches, and top-down theory-driven approaches
How early language learning in children differs from LLM learning
Mike’s rational speech act model of language use, which considers the intentions or pragmatics of speakers and listeners in dialogue.

BI 170 Ali Mohebi: Starting a Research Lab

BI 170 Ali Mohebi: Starting a Research Lab

Brain Inspired
Brain Inspired
BI 170 Ali Mohebi: Starting a Research Lab
Loading
/

In this episode I have a casual chat with Ali Mohebi about his new faculty position and his plans for the future.

BI 169 Andrea Martin: Neural Dynamics and Language

BI 169 Andrea Martin: Neural Dynamics and Language

Brain Inspired
Brain Inspired
BI 169 Andrea Martin: Neural Dynamics and Language
Loading
/

My guest today is Andrea Martin, who is the Research Group Leader in the department of Language and Computation in Neural Systems at the Max Plank Institute and the Donders Institute. Andrea is deeply interested in understanding how our biological brains process and represent language. To this end, she is developing a theoretical model of language. The aim of the model is to account for the properties of language, like its structure, its compositionality, its infinite expressibility, while adhering to physiological data we can measure from human brains.

BI 168 Frauke Sandig and Eric Black w Alex Gomez-Marin: AWARE: Glimpses of Consciousness

BI 168 Frauke Sandig and Eric Black w Alex Gomez-Marin: AWARE: Glimpses of Consciousness

Brain Inspired
Brain Inspired
BI 168 Frauke Sandig and Eric Black w Alex Gomez-Marin: AWARE: Glimpses of Consciousness
Loading
/

This is the first in a mini-series of episodes with Alex Gomez-Marin, exploring how the arts and humanities can impact (neuro)science. Artistic creations, like cinema, have the ability to momentarily lower our ever-critical scientific mindset and allow us to imagine alternate possibilities and experience emotions outside our normal scientific routines. Might this feature of art potentially change our scientific attitudes and perspectives?